Skip to main content Skip to footer 
Few matters in family law carry greater emotional weight than disputes concerning children. Questions of where a child should live, how time should be shared between parents, and who should make important decisions about upbringing carry profound significance for everyone involved.
Tower Bridge Legal provides considered guidance through these difficult issues. We work with parents to reach outcomes that serve their children’s interests, whether through agreement or, where necessary, through the courts.
The legal framework rests on a single overriding principle: the child’s welfare is the court’s paramount consideration. This principle shapes judicial reasoning at every turn. It also shapes the advice we give.
We encourage parents to reflect on what genuinely serves their children rather than what advances their own position. Courts notice the distinction. Arrangements built around children’s needs tend to prove more durable than those forged in the heat of parental dispute.
Parental Responsibility
Parental responsibility describes the bundle of rights, duties, and authority that attaches to being a parent. Mothers acquire it automatically at birth and married fathers do so as well. Unmarried fathers obtain parental responsibility if named on the birth certificate, through a formal agreement, or by court order.
Holding parental responsibility entitles you to participate in significant decisions about your child: education, medical treatment, religious upbringing, changes of name. Alterations to living arrangements following separation do not ordinarily affect parental responsibility. Both parents usually retain it.
Child Arrangements Orders
order. This single order, which replaced what were previously termed residence and contact orders, specifies with whom a child lives and the time they spend with each parent.
Courts hold broad discretion, tailoring arrangements to the circumstances of the individual child. No automatic entitlement to equal time exists, though the legislation recognises that involvement of both parents in a child’s life will ordinarily further that child’s welfare.
Proceedings commence with an application, though hearings do not follow immediately. Cafcass, the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service, undertakes safeguarding enquiries and may prepare a report. Before issuing, parents are generally expected to have attended a mediation information meeting, save where domestic abuse is alleged or urgency applies.
The court process unfolds across several hearings designed to narrow the issues, encourage settlement, and, where necessary, determine matters at a final hearing.
The Welfare Checklist
Contested cases require judges to apply a statutory welfare checklist. It directs attention to the child’s physical, emotional, and educational needs; the likely effect of any change in circumstances; their age, sex, background, and relevant characteristics; any harm suffered or at risk of being suffered; how capable each parent is of meeting the child’s needs; and the range of orders available.
We assist clients in understanding how these factors apply to their case and in presenting evidence that addresses each one.
Domestic Abuse and Safeguarding
Allegations of domestic abuse alter the character of children proceedings significantly. Where abuse is raised, the court must consider whether a fact-finding hearing is required to examine what occurred.
Findings made at that hearing then inform the welfare decision. Where abuse is established, arrangements may include safeguards: supervised contact, restrictions on communication, or other protective measures.
We represent both those raising allegations and those defending against them, approaching each matter with the seriousness it warrants.
Relocation
Applications to relocate with a child, whether within the United Kingdom or abroad, present particular difficulty. Where a child arrangements order exists, permission is required before a parent may move in a way that would disrupt the arrangements.
Courts weigh the interests of the relocating parent against the effect on the child’s relationship with the parent left behind.
Outcomes in these cases are rarely certain. We advise on the merits of proposed moves and represent clients seeking permission or opposing relocation applications.
Specific Issue and Prohibited Steps Orders
Not every disagreement fits within a child arrangements order. Specific issue orders address particular questions: which school a child should attend, whether they should receive a certain medical procedure.
Prohibited steps orders prevent a parent from taking specified action without consent, such as removing a child from the jurisdiction or changing their name. We advise on the appropriate form of order and make applications where agreement proves impossible.
Extended Family Members
Grandparents and other relatives hold no automatic right to time with a child. They may, however, seek the court’s permission to apply for a child arrangements order.
Permission is granted where a genuine issue exists to be tried. We act for grandparents and extended family members whose relationship with a child is being obstructed. We also represent parents resisting applications they consider not to be in the child’s best interests.
Enforcement
Court orders achieve little if they are ignored. Where one party fails to comply with a child arrangements order, the other may seek enforcement.
Courts possess various powers: unpaid work requirements, compensation for frustrated contact, or, in serious cases, committal. We advise on proportionate responses to breach and represent those seeking to enforce orders that are not being honoured.
Placing Children First
Children thrive when their parents cooperate. They suffer when conflict takes hold. We keep this reality central to our advice but if you are involved in a dispute concerning your children, Tower Bridge Legal offers guidance that combines legal rigour with recognition that these matters touch young lives. Contact us to discuss how we may assist.
